Cape Town Lesbians

Home Blog Religion & Spirituality Homosexuality and the Bible

Homosexuality and the Bible

E-mail Print PDF
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
( 301 Votes )

Ever get tired of people throwing Bible verses at you, and using religion as an excuse for condemning homosexuality? Well, this is something I came across many years ago, and I still laugh every time I read it.

On her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:


=============

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination... End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath.Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle- room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan.

James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus Dept. of Curriculum,
Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia

Comments
Add New Search
Briliant
Steph Richards (94.246.126.xxx) 2009-06-30 12:31:40

That was brilliant.
Absolutely well said.
Thank you for this.
Now i have a tad more ammunition....

thanks
Simone (196.14.214.xxx) 2009-07-02 07:39:02

For publishing what we were all thinking anyway.
Ms
Amelda Rossouw (41.3.41.xxx) 2009-07-06 11:11:55

I have been condemned by my own family and parents alike. I would honestly like to know if there is any where else we can log in to learn more about this issue. I am married to a woman now for almost two years and we have a complete monogamous relationship like about 40% of the heterosexual couples out there do (lol)! Can anyone assist me - direct me to a site where I can get to know more about this issue seen throught the Bible and God''s eyes? My email address is ameldarossouw@gmail.com
Anonymous (41.3.41.xxx) 2009-07-06 11:19:08

I would also like to find out where the so called "gay church" is in the northern suburbs of cape town. Thank you very much!
Ms
amelda rossouw (41.3.41.xxx) 2009-07-06 11:21:57

Sori!! u can let me know about the church at ameldarossouw@gmail.com. Thank you very much! PS currently going to Hillsong in Cape Town, but although we are "äccepted" - conversion back to""normalcy"/ heterosexuality is stil the best AND ONLY way according to them
Pastor
Pastor (198.54.202.xxx) 2009-07-06 12:55:30

I am a Pastor of an international church and wrote recently on a website, regarding Religion and LGBT. I am the church leader of the church across Africa, although based in the Western Cape. Please feel free to read what I have written on the following link:

http://www.afterellen.com/node/25990

Feel free to ask questions, should you wish. I will answer to the best of my ability.

Bridgitt (128.42.166.xxx) 2009-08-11 16:00:27

This is fantastic!
Pezzie (64.89.58.xxx) 2009-08-11 21:25:35

I've read this before, but everytime I read it I'm astounded that nobody else appears to bring these issues to the forefront, just Leviticus 18:22.

Thank you for printing this
It's a journey
Eric Kent (76.175.162.xxx) 2009-08-11 22:01:37

A great response letter!! Dealing with being lgbtq is always a struggle when it comes to religion, whether Jewish or Christian or "other". The beliefs may be different, but the stories are very similar.
I've posted my personal journey to help those who are going through there own struggle - www.MyJesusJourney.wordpress.com.
Glenda (76.7.230.xxx) 2009-08-11 23:45:54

AWSOME!!!!!!!!!!
Amber (99.50.96.xxx) 2009-08-12 00:01:31

this is true awesomeness. I couldn't have said it better. thanks.
This only works for the Jews...
Joshua (98.24.171.xxx) 2009-08-12 00:54:06

This only works for the Jews.

Hebrews 8:8-9, "The time is coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the Lord"

Leviticus is a book of the Old Testament, a book of laws written for the Jews. With Jesus came a new covenant (the new testament) which said that these laws were no longer necessary to live by.

Take this up with the Jews. Still, it's funny.
Leanne (195.93.21.xxx) 2009-08-13 18:07:44

What a fantastic letter! what more can i say!!! x
just an old rancher
Tom (67.142.130.xxx) 2009-08-14 04:30:46

Damn! That's good. I intend to save and use the logic and I ain't even gay. Thanks.
christa (41.7.108.xxx) 2009-08-19 12:29:24

Im glad to see that gay ppl are still holding on to God no matter if they are gay. Ppl confuse the writings of the old testament with the new..writings should also be interpreted in the right context settings. God established a new convenant of LOVE! God loves gay ppl too, he made us!!!

Can anyone tell me where the gay church is? Would love to go!!!


Marisa (196.46.71.xxx) 2009-08-23 10:14:27

Good argument raised.

But remember not all laws in the old Testament are the same. Some are ritual laws (eg shaving of beards, eating of pork & shellfish), while other are moral laws (eg 10 Commandments etc).

Jesus came to fulfill The Law (meaning the ritual laws) so that we no longer are bound by them. But we are still required to adhere to the moral laws.

See also:

-> http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/homotheo.html
-> http://www.tektonics.org/lp/lev18.html
-> http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5298
-> http://www.tektonics.org/qt/romhom.html

Gay Activist Stellenbosch
Dewald (146.232.65.xxx) 2009-10-06 10:01:52

That is like saying that gay people do not love each other, Stripping the world of the ritual law is not what Jesus came to do.

Most of those texts you refer to do not mention that the sin is not the homosexuality but the lust involved. In these texts you have to put that time in to context. If you follow the creationist's view, they were sleeping with there sisters for procreation and brothers for fun(lust). Bring love into account and it is a whole other ball game. Since God is love, do we have the right to deny one person to express it to another?
Marisa (196.46.71.xxx) 2009-10-06 13:32:32

If the issue was love vs lust I don't see why homosexuality would be specifically mentioned in the Bible, as there are plenty other texts that forbit adultery and fornication (i.e LUST).

Having said that, I don't think the love argument is a valid one in any case. Yes, God is love and He is a perfect love. Our perception of love has become so skewed that to say something is done in love doesn't count for much anymore.

For example. there are people who are in "love" with inanimate objects (cars, walls, etc) - does that make it right?

A lot of abusers will claim they "love" the person they are abusing and that this is why they do it - does that make the abuse right?

I could go on, but I think you catch my drift...
Gay Activist Stellenbosch
Dewald (146.232.65.xxx) 2009-10-06 15:48:44

Homosexuality is not specifically mentioned, actually the whole concept of homosexuality did not exist in those days. The current use of the term has its roots in the broader 19th-century tradition of personality taxonomy. And the bible LOVES to repeat itself in many ways and using many different examples.

I sincerely hope that you would love a person more than an inanimate object. Objectum-sexuals are not very well understood, but I would not compare it to the love between two people. I do not think that the the love of an object is eros.

You might want to read up on your psychology when it comes to abuse though. That is not love, that is fear. The same as in Stockholm Syndrome.

But enough about that, are you then proposing that a God made certain people, not to love them?
Church
Anon (196.210.203.xxx) 2009-10-10 14:18:09

http://www.goodhopemcc.org
good
drew (70.74.168.xxx) 2009-12-26 22:16:05

this is a good quote. but the guy who wrote it didn't come up with it on his own


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHaVUjjH3EI
Chief Blasphemer
Kedge Drahl (24.23.53.xxx) 2009-12-27 00:20:07

I'm printing this and giving it to my Bible Thumping Daughter in Law. She is Holier than I am. I'm sure She will appreciate this.. Har !!
Dr. Laura
slick (99.56.45.xxx) 2009-12-27 04:01:43

Please be advised that Dr. Laura does not condemn homosexuality as stated by this letter. This letter was never addressed to Dr. Laura in the first place.
have you people even READ that book?
misanthropope (70.144.190.xxx) 2009-12-30 10:38:37

Jesus was queerer than a three dollar bill.

Seriously, i defy ANYONE to provide a coherent rationale for Judas's behavior that didn't involve a love triangle.


The problem with this...
Mithotyn (24.236.234.xxx) 2010-01-01 00:10:16

The problem with this is that christians believe that sin is O.K. to commit so long as you repent them. And, of course, gays don't repent. So a devout christian will just pray for himself when his neighbor works on the sabbath and expect a gay to do the same the next time they get an erection looking at a man.
not that original...
Spitsbee (70.16.201.xxx) 2010-01-03 07:31:47

This is good stuff, but clearly this professor Kaufmann watched "The West Wing" before writing this. I mean, it's taken almost word for word from the show.
The West Wing Did it
alex (96.237.133.xxx) 2010-01-05 08:13:27

In an episode of the West Wing, i thinks its called "Midterm" The president goes off on a radio talk show host in the exact same manner.
West Wing copied it. (66.63.79.xxx) 2010-01-07 04:22:24

The west wing episode was made after this letter was written.
well
emstro (86.137.178.xxx) 2010-01-11 22:46:11

"This only works for the Jews...

...Leviticus is a book of the Old Testament, a book of laws written for the Jews. With Jesus came a new covenant (the new testament) which said that these laws were no longer necessary to live by.

Take this up with the Jews. Still, it's funny."

Actually It doesn't actually work for anybody - despite your misguided conviction - because it's as obvious as snow that both testaments are FAIRY STORIES.

Now get your voodoo out of my face, and keep your witch-burning, whore-stoning, fag-murdering, cosmos-denying bullsh*t OFF MY INTERNET!
emstro (86.137.178.xxx) 2010-01-11 23:08:26

Marisa, you say the following:

"If the issue was love vs lust I don't see why homosexuality would be specifically mentioned in the Bible, as there are plenty other texts that forbit adultery and fornication (i.e LUST).

Having said that, I don't think the love argument is a valid one in any case. Yes, God is love and He is a perfect love. Our perception of love has become so skewed that to say something is done in love doesn't count for much anymore."

If human perception HAS become so skewed, Marisa, then how is it that you feel you - or anyone - can be relied upon when attempting to interpret scripture? Our relationship with scripture (or any text) is borne out of language, and relayed from person-to-person; how, therefore, can it be relied upon to prove your arguments?

You see, you say: "I don't THINK [my capitals] the love argument is a valid one in any case", and "I don't SEE WHY homosexuality would be specifically mentioned in the bible).

You get caught because you try to use your language and your experience to do something that you've already said neither can do.

On what grounds are you able to assert that God is love and (furthermore) that he is perfect love anyway? Personal experience? What does it even mean to say that God is "perfect" love?
Marisa (196.211.225.xxx) 2010-01-12 08:41:40

@emstro - I said our perception of love has become skewed, not necessarily our perception of everything else.

Yes, our interpretation of scripture is borne out of language. This is also why one needs to compare different translations of the Bible with each other and read things in context in order to correctly understand what a particular verse is trying to tell us.

The reason why I assert that God is perfect love, is because He has revealed Himself to be so, through scripture, personal experience, etc. Perfect love is difficult for us to comprehend, since we don't have the capacity for it ourselves.

CONVERTING NON-BELIEVERS
Lupe (41.157.10.xxx) 2010-01-13 00:22:24

To try and convince non-believers that there is a God who loves ALL of us with a Perfect Love is impossible. That is if we try to convince them with only words.
We who have experienced the Almighty's unconditional love and forgiveness know that He not only exist but that without Him we would not.
There is no point in trying to prove it to anyone. We can only pray that we will reflect his Spirit and Love through our way of life and our DEEDS.

I am a Born Again Christian Lesbian and yes, I struggled for more than 25 years with the issue of homosexuality and Christianity. Thank the Lord that I eventually came to the realisation that I do not need the approval of others and humanity as a whole. That the ONLY REAL issue is that I must follow in His steps and look for His approval in whatever I do and say.

In doing that and Believing that we can make a difference, others WILL believe...
Response to Dr. Kauffman
Rick (71.235.44.xxx) 2010-06-24 23:48:12

Here is my opinion about the letter attributed to Dr. James Kauffman, regarding a radio show produced by Dr. Laura Schlessinger on the topic of homosexuality. My answer is somewhat lengthy, because the topic is so broad and involved, but I’ve tried to be as concise and accurate as I can.

Summary Response:
Jews are required to obey the Old Testament laws. Christians are required to obey the New Testament and those things in the Old Testament which still apply. For example, we are required to obey the Moral Law contained in the Old Testament, such as the Ten Commandments. We are no longer required to follow the Ceremonial Law, such as the performing of animal sacrifices. We are no longer required to follow the Judicial Law, administered by priests and judges, with its set of rules, regulations, and punishments. Jesus fulfilled the Ceremonial Law with his sacrifice on the cross, and He fulfilled the Judicial Law with his ascension as our King. He was our Passover lamb. His blood covers over our sins. If there was another way, He wouldn’t have had to die on the cross for us. There is no forgiveness of sins without the shedding of blood - Hebrews 9:22. Here’s what Jesus said about the Old Testament (the Law) in Matthew 5:

17"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

What does the Bible Say about Homosexuality:
Homosexuality isn’t only condemned in the Old Testament. It’s condemned in the New Testament too, as shown in 1 Corinthians 6:

9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

So, homosexuals will not go to heaven. End of debate.

Oh, but wait a minute. There are a lot of other people mentioned in this passage who won’t go to heaven either – fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, prostitutes, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, slanderers, and swindlers too. This was written by the Apostle Paul, who wrote half the New Testament, and who was Jesus’ chosen messenger to the Gentiles (Acts 9).

So, what do we do? Is homosexuality worse than the other sins listed above? Probably – most other sins aren’t listed as an abomination. But this is missing the point. The point is that homosexuality is just one type of sin that will keep them out of heaven. There are many others. Homosexuals are not going to be kept out of heaven because of their sexual predilections. They will be kept out of heaven because they are sinners, just like everyone else.

If I were having a conversation about this topic with a homosexual I would say, “Let’s put your homosexuality to the side for a moment. Have you ever stolen anything, even a paper clip from the office? Have you ever been angry with someone? Have you ever looked lustfully at a person you weren’t married to? Have you ever lied?” If they were honest, they would say, “Yes”. Then I would respond, “So, you are a thief, a murderer (Matthew 5:21-22), an adulterer (Matthew 5:27-30), and a liar (Revelation 21:, and expect to be let into heaven where nothing unholy will be allowed to enter (Revelation 21:27)?”

Response to Specific Points made by the Dr. Kauffman below:
(1) Slavery. When we think of slavery, we think of evil men going to Africa, kidnapping people against their will from villages, forcing them onto ships where many of them died, and selling them to cruel masters, thus condemning them to a horrible life of servitude for generations to come. In biblical times, slavery may have been that for many, but for the Hebrews it could be entered into voluntarily to learn a trade and/or pay off debts in return for food and shelter for up to seven years. At the end of the seven year period they could choose to go free or be joined with their master for life (see Exodus 21:1-6).
• Conclusion: The apostle Paul called on Christians to accept the lot in life they were born into, but to free themselves from slavery if they wished (1 Corinthians 7: 20-21).
(2) Selling Children. You have to read Exodus 21:7-11 to get the full context. A father could sell his Hebrew daughter to be a servant of another Hebrew man, not a slave. If she did not please his new master, he must allow her to be redeemed (set free for a fair price). If she does please her new master, he must either give her to his son as a wife or take her as a wife himself. If he does not care for her as a wife (provide food, clothing, and marital rights – sex) she is to set free for no cost. So this passage is talking about Hebrew servants, not slaves.
• Conclusion: God wanted people in this situation treated with respect.
(3) Menstrual Uncleanness. Ceremonial uncleanness was a temporary situation caused by many things, such as touching a dead body. Leviticus 15 specifically refers to ceremonial uncleanness due to bodily discharges (diarrhea, infections, spit, semen, and blood). God is a holy God and cannot be approached by anyone who is ceremonially unclean.
• Here is what Leviticus 15:31 says: " 'You must keep the Israelites separate from things that make them unclean, so they will not die in their uncleanness for defiling my dwelling place, [a] which is among them.'”
• Conclusion: This is part of the ceremonial law and no longer applies because we believe by faith that Jesus makes us righteous before God. Given what we now know about the passage of germs, it’s not a bad idea to avoid the bodily discharges of another person. The passage also teaches us about God’s holiness – a very important concept to understand.
(4) Animal Sacrifices. The Hebrews would only perform animal sacrifices at places appointed by God (Leviticus 17:3-4). They were never to sacrifice elsewhere. If they did, they were to be cut off from the Jewish nation. These sacrifices were to be holy ceremonies performed only be priests.
• Conclusion: Animal sacrifices are not supposed to be performed in someone’s backyard.
(5) The Sabbath. Here are some relevant scripture references to The Sabbath:
• The Sabbath is one of the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20).
• Exodus 31:13 says: "Say to the Israelites, 'You must observe my Sabbaths. This will be a sign between me and you for the generations to come, so you may know that I am the LORD, who makes you holy.”
• Exodus 23:12 says: "Six days do your work, but on the seventh day do not work, so that your ox and your donkey may rest and the slave born in your household, and the alien as well, may be refreshed.”
• Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath (Luke 6:5). He condemned hypocritical observances of it and demonstrated/allowed for doing good to others on the Sabbath.
• The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week (Saturday). The early Christians had a day of worship (and I assume rest) on the first day of the week (Sunday) in honor of Jesus’ resurrection (Acts 20:7, 1 Corinthians 16:2).
• Conclusion: Christians should have a day of rest and worship on Sunday and not be burdened with following rules and regulations that are part of the ceremonial law.
(6) Shellfish. The Hebrews were not permitted to east various creatures as noted in Leviticus 11.
• Acts 10:9-15 says: 9About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, "Get up, Peter. Kill and eat." 14"Surely not, Lord!" Peter replied. "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean." 15The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean."
• Conclusion: The prohibition against eating non-kosher food was removed in the New Testament as shown in Acts 10:9-15, Matthew 15:11, and 1 Timothy 4:3-5.
(7) Handicapped People. Leviticus 21 says that priests were the direct interface with God and must be holy. They must not be ceremonially unclean, as described above. They could not sacrifice animals that had defects. This was to prevent people from sacrificing their worst animals to get rid of them. Likewise, the priests offering the sacrifices had to be without defect.
• Conclusion: The sacrificial system that was part of the Ceremonial Law no longer applies because of what Jesus did on the cross for us.
( Trimming Hair. This relates to being ceremonially clean before God. Priests were the direct intermediaries with God and had to be holy.
• Leviticus 21:5-6 says: 5 " 'Priests must not shave their heads or shave off the edges of their beards or cut their bodies. 6 They must be holy to their God and must not profane the name of their God. Because they present the offerings made to the LORD by fire, the food of their God, they are to be holy.
• The apostle Paul had his head shaved as part of a purification right as a sign to Jews who believed in Jesus (Acts 21: 17-26). This was not done for Gentile believers.
• Conclusion: Haircutting is part of the Ceremonial Law and no longer applies because Jesus is now our intermediary with God. We are justified before God by faith in Jesus Christ, not by observing the law (Ephesians 2:8-9).
(9) Touching Dead Animals. This would make a priest ceremonially unclean. He had to be holy when performing his duties before God. Otherwise, he might be killed as two of Aaron’s sons were (Leviticus 10:1-2).
• Conclusion: This is part of the ceremonial law and no longer applies because Jesus makes us righteous before God. Given what we now know about the passage of germs, it’s not a bad idea to avoid touching dead bodies.
(10) Mixing Different Crops. This is not part of the Moral Law, so I don’t think it applies to us. If you want to mix corn and asparagus in the same field go ahead. Have fun harvesting it.
(11) Mixing Different Clothes. Looking at the context of Leviticus 19, this command is addressed to all the Israelites.
• Leviticus 19:2 says: Speak to the entire assembly of Israel and say to them: 'Be holy because I, the LORD your God, am holy.’
• God wanted his people to be holy. Having the same type of clothing, without mixture is a sign of purity. For example, Aaron’s ephod was made of linen (Exodus 28:6).
• Revelation 19:8 says: 8Fine linen, bright and clean, was given her to wear." (Fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the saints.) The “her” is the bride of Christ; those whose names are written in the Book of Life (i.e., allowed to enter heaven).
• The armies of heaven will be dressed in fine linen when following Jesus to conquer His enemies (Revelation 19:13).
• Conclusion: While we’ll be wearing linen robes in heaven one day signifying our purity, there is no New Testament requirement that we do this now. Thus it must be considered part of the ceremonial law, which no longer applies because of what Jesus did for us on the cross.
(12) Cursing and Blaspheming. This falls under the category of the Moral Law and still applies. It should not be done.
• Colossians 3:5-10 says: 5Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry. 6Because of these, the wrath of God is coming.[b] 7You used to walk in these ways, in the life you once lived. 8But now you must rid yourselves of all such things as these: anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language from your lips. 9Do not lie to each other, since you have taken off your old self with its practices 10and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge in the image of its Creator.
• Conclusion: You shouldn’t curse and blaspheme because you are bringing the wrath of God upon yourself.
(13) Sleeping with Relatives. This falls under the category of the Moral Law and should not be done. It is a form of sexual immorality, as described in (12).

Conclusion:
I used to think that only the New Testament applied to Christians. But after reading Jesus’ words in Matthew 5 (quoted above) and elsewhere, I no longer think that. Jesus specifically affirmed the authority of the Old Testament in John 10:35 by saying “the scripture cannot be broken.” Jesus specifically referred to many “hard to believe” Old Testament stories such as Sodom and Gomorrah (Matthew 10:15), Jonah and the Whale (Matthew 12), Able - son of Adam & Eve (Matthew 23:35), and Noah and the Ark (Matthew 24:37-3. Is Jesus right about the big stuff (believing in Him to be saved) and wrong about the other stuff?

2 Timothy 3:16-17 says: 16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

You can trust the entire Bible as God’s manual to guide your life. There is much to learn in all of it, even those part that have already been fulfilled. If you haven’t already done so, I suggest you read the entire New Testament through at least once (twice would be preferred). Then read through the entire Old Testament in light of the New Testament.

If there is something in the Bible that your life (or society) doesn’t line up with, the problem isn’t with the Bible. The problem is with you (or our culture).


Rick
Getting it wrong
Queery (146.232.43.xxx) 2010-06-25 07:54:52

Oh my word, can one person read the Bible so wrong, and believe the NIV translation of it!

I love it when Christians pick and choose what rules they want to follow in the bible and which they want just ignore.

Your God gave you a brain, start using it yourself and stop looking for the people that are going to your hell and start living for those you will see in your heaven!

The Queery
www.queery.co.za
wedding (96.9.151.xxx) 2010-08-09 06:39:29

PricesSimple Wedding Dress have never been better due to the economicSimple Wedding Gowns
climate of the past few years and retailers globally Plus size Simple Wedding Dresses are doing everything in their 2010 Simple Wedding Dresses to market their stock and market cheap simple wedding dress at reduced prices making engagement rings under $300 easy to discover. plus size simple wedding dress
more very good point to note, if your budget is $300 for an engagement lace simple wedding dress
and you see one for $400 in a shop window, go in and ask and tell the summer simple wedding dress you only have $300 for that particular ring. Remember most white simple wedding dress have a mark up of 100% or more so you possibly can and certainly in today’s climate do a little mature simple wedding dress bartering for discount.Perhaps you haveelegant simple wedding dress thought about creating your own personal engagement pretty simple wedding dress? I am not really referring to creating the diamond however piecing together the band as well as unique simple wedding dress both individually. You are able to purchase loose Victorian simple wedding dress and choose the band in the various store or even evening dresses wholesale. You also have to think about the cost to have theevening dressses
mount the stone onto the band. Although cheap evening dress is often a very good idea is might be time consuming but can also be well worth eveningdresses-wholesale.com within the long haul. Maintaining the actual engagement evening dresses 2010 below $300 can effortlessly be achieved. Never take into account plus size evening dresses
cheap but clever; you'll have plenty to spend your money on for the large long evening dressesitself.So you have decided to invest in some wedding sexy evening dressessewing supplies!  Whether you have decided to go into the business of restoring short evening dresses, altering existing creations, or making your own and others discount evening dresses
; you want to make sure you have the most common supplies on hand to design your  formal evening dresses. The first consideration you will have is material.  Wedding gowns come in a variety of designer evening dresses: silk,satin, cotton, linen, andvintage evening dresses
stretch velour are very common materials.; If you are just repairing dresses or doing simple alterations then you do not need to have a lot of theseelegant evening dresses on hand.

Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 14 July 2009 08:14 )  
Cape Town Lesbians


Twitter Feed


Afrigator